Earth science is the study of Earth and its processes. Earth scientists also study Earth relative to other objects in the solar system. The four main branches of Earth science are geology, oceanography, meteorology, and astronomy.
Geology means “study of the earth.” Geologists study the materials that make up the earth, such as rocks and minerals. They study the interior and exterior structures of Earth and its processes, such as the rock cycle. Many geologists learn about Earth’s history by studying evidence recorded in rocks, such as fossils.
Oceanography is the study of Earth’s oceans and the organisms that live in them. Oceanographers analyze the composition and movement of ocean waters and study how ocean waters affect weather and climate. They research ways to protect and preserve Earth’s oceans and marine life.
Meteorology is the study of Earth’s atmosphere or the mass of air that surrounds Earth. Processes in Earth’s atmosphere are responsible for the weather and climate that occur on Earth’s surface. Meteorologists measure data such as air temperature, wind speed or direction, and humidity. By studying the data, meteorologists attempt to predict the weather. In addition, meteorologists study the history of climate, which helps them learn more about the earth’s current climate and how it is changing.
Astronomy is the study of celestial objects beyond Earth’s atmosphere. The reason these astronomical objects are important to earth science is that they affect systems and processes on Earth. For example, the gravitational pull of Earth’s moon affects ocean tides. Energy from the sun contributes to many Earth processes, such as evaporation and precipitation. Objects such as meteors and asteroids may enter Earth’s atmosphere and strike Earth’s surface. These objects can cause significant changes on Earth.
1 Earth science is important because:
Like scientists in other fields, Earth scientists make observations, ask questions, make predictions, and conduct experiments. They draw conclusions and report their findings.
The scientific method is a systematic method of research that includes specific steps to test a hypothesis. The scientific method involves carefully going through these steps to find an answer to a problem. The scientific method was first documented by England’s Sir Francis Bacon (1561–1626). The scientific method is an organized process by which anyone can solve a problem. The method includes seven steps:
This process can be repeated, even within the same experiment, depending on the results of the experiment.
Each step of the scientific method has a purpose, so it’s important to include each step. Below, details are given about each step in the scientific method. After reading through the steps, you’ll practice with the key terms.
All research starts with an observation about something that’s occurring naturally. You make observations every day. Being curious about the world you see and thinking about why something is happening is the first step in the scientific process. If you want to learn more about the topic, then the next step is to conduct research. You would look up information at a library or on the internet to see what other people have already studied on this topic. This background research helps you make an informed decision about the next step in the scientific method.
After making observations and conducting research, the next step in the scientific method is to state the problem. The researcher takes the observation and turns it into a question. Examples of scientific problems are: Why are the glaciers disappearing? How does climate change affect reptiles?
Controlled experiments have a control group and an experimental group. The control group is a group that continues under normal conditions. The experimental group is exposed to something that’s being tested in the experiment. A variable is a factor, condition, or relationship that can be changed in an experiment.
These terms can be confusing when you first learn about them. You’ll see several examples of these variables in a practice experiment that you’ll complete later in this lesson.
A hypothesis is a possible explanation for the problem being studied. It’s often written as an if/then statement. The hypothesis combines information about the variables to be used in an experiment. It identifies the independent variable and a possible outcome—the dependent variable. When the experiment is complete, the researcher will decide whether the research supported the hypothesis or not.
After identifying the problem and writing a hypothesis, the researcher next designs the experiment. This means determining what materials will be used in the experiment and writing a procedure, the step-by-step directions for the experiment. The researcher pays careful attention to the variables so that only the independent variable is different between the control group and the experimental group.
The researcher is now ready to carry out the experiment. During the experiment, observations are made. These observations, called data, are written down. Data can be quantitative or qualitative.
If you were to describe the color of soil, you would be recording qualitative data. However, you could also use a tool called a spectrophotometer to record the wavelengths of light that the soil absorbs to collect quantitative data. To remember the difference between these types of data, look at the root words: “qualitative” refers to quality, and “quantitative” refers to quantity.
After conducting an experiment and recording data, the results need to be analyzed. After analyzing the data, the researcher decides if the data supports the hypothesis. If the data matches the researcher’s prediction of what would happen, then the hypothesis is supported. If the data doesn’t match what the researcher thought would happen, then the hypothesis isn’t supported. If the hypothesis isn’t supported, the researcher goes back to the third step: He or she considers this new data and writes a new hypothesis, then designs and carries out a new experiment to test that prediction.
To draw a conclusion about the experiment, the researcher must make inferences. An inference is a logical explanation based on an observation. For example, you might observe that the grass grows after it rains. And, you might observe that the grass dies when it doesn’t rain. You might make a logical conclusion, or inference, that the amount of rain impacts how much the grass grows.
Watch this video to learn more about the differences between inferences and observations.
The scientific method was developed to organize natural human thinking. Consider the following example about a farmer and one of his crops. Read through the experiment. Then, you’ll have a chance to identify aspects of the scientific method in another experiment.
In this example, the farmer may discuss what was learned with other farmers growing tomatoes in the local area. In the scientific community, results obtained from scientific research are often shared via presentations, journals, and other publications.
An important aspect of a scientist’s work is presenting results and communicating with peers. Scientists may present results at scientific meetings or conferences. This approach reaches only those present at the conference.
Most scientists present their results in peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals. Peer-reviewed articles are scientific papers that are reviewed by fellow scientists who have agreed to read and comment on the paper. These peers are assigned by the journal’s editorial board, and assumed to be unbiased professionals. Their names are often withheld from the author. The reviewers, experts in a particular research area, judge whether the scientist’s work is suitable for publication according to rigorous standards. The process of peer review helps ensure that the research described in a scientific paper is original, significant, logical, ethical, and thorough.
Scientists publish their work so other scientists can share their results and reproduce their experiments under different conditions to expand on the findings. The original experimental results must be consistent with the findings of other scientists to be considered accurate. Most scientific papers follow a similar format and include these sections:
The two main types of data that scientists share are qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative data include descriptions, observations, and explanations. Quantitative data is information that can be verified, measured, or calculated, such as numbers, values, and percentages. Qualitative data considers the quality of something, which is not measured numerically, but by traits or categories. Examples of qualitative data are interviews, case studies, and written documents.
Scientists often organize quantitative data visually using graphics, such as charts, graphs, or tables. The following are some common graphics scientists use to present data.
A bar graph has horizontal or vertical bars. Each bar represents a numerical value—the higher the value, the higher or longer the bar. Bar graphs are very helpful for comparing categories of information. Information is charted along a horizontal x-axis and a vertical y-axis.
A pie chart is a circular chart divided into slices, each representing a proportion of the whole, or a percentage. Pie charts are helpful in presenting statistical data.
A line graph features a series of points connected by lines. Some line graphs have a single line. Others feature multiple lines that can be compared. Line graphs are especially helpful in showing changes over time.
On a scatterplot, each piece of data is represented by a dot. Scatterplots are used to find the relationship between two or more variables. Scatterplots make it easy to identify outliers in data. Outliers are values that are very different from the rest of the data.
A timeline lists events in the order in which they occurred. Scientists often use timelines to identify significant moments in Earth’s history, such as the first appearance of plant life or the disappearance of dinosaurs.
A table arranges data into vertical columns and horizontal rows. The point at which a row and a column intersect is known as a cell. Scientists may include text and/or numerical data in tables.
High Temperatures (°F) in Three Eastern Cities (January 2019)
Boston, MA | Philadelphia, PA | Miami, FL | |
Monday, 1/7 | 32 | 37 | 77 |
Tuesday, 1/8 | 45 | 54 | 80 |
Wednesday, 1/9 | 43 | 44 | 78 |
Thursday, 1/10 | 34 | 38 | 74 |
Friday, 1/11 | 33 | 42 | 74 |
Saturday, 1/12 | 40 | 44 | 77 |
Sunday, 1/13 | 41 | 44 | 75 |
When other scientists are able to replicate the results of an experiment, support for the hypothesis grows. Over time, a well-tested hypothesis may lead to the development of a scientific theory. A scientific theory is a thoroughly tested and confirmed explanation for a set of observations or phenomena. Scientific theory is the foundation of scientific knowledge. With time, as a theory gathers consensus, it becomes widely accepted as it replaces other theories. For example, the theory of plate tectonics suggests that Earth’s surface is composed of several large, moving parts, called plates. As these plates move, they may pull apart, crash into, or slide past one another. Rift valleys, mountains, and earthquakes may result from these movements. The theory of plate tectonics explains why scientists find mountains in certain locations, why animals have similarities across continents, and a host of other observations.
A popular misconception is that theories are like guesses and that with time, “true” theories mature into “facts.” This is absolutely false—theories never become facts in a scientific sense. A theory is an explanation supported by evidence that hasn’t been falsified. Once proposed, a theory is subject to challenges by other scientists, who try to falsify or disprove it. Once falsified, a theory ceases to be a theory. The longer a theory withstands these challenges, the stronger it becomes.
A scientific theory shouldn’t be confused with a scientific law. Scientific laws are often expressed as mathematical formulas. They describe how elements of nature behave under certain conditions, but they don’t explain why they occur. An example of a scientific law is Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation, expressed as the formula Fg = G(m1m2/r2). According to this law, any object in the universe attracts any other with a force (Fg) that’s directly proportional to the product of their masses (m1m2) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them (r2). The letter G in the formula represents the universal gravitational constant.
To summarize, scientists use the scientific method to develop hypotheses, theories, and laws. Hypotheses offer possible explanations. Scientific theories offer thoroughly tested and widely accepted explanations. Scientific laws offer observations without explanation.1. 1.2 The Process of Science by Matthew R. Fisher, Editor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.